2026 · Public Benchmark Leadership SHA-256 Sealed

Run the pilot.
If we cannot map $5M+ in operator-agreed addressable value,
you do not pay for the pilot.

A 4-week read-only shadow pilot on your historian and alarm exports. We agree the KPI model first. If the sealed evidence pack maps $5M+ in addressable operational value, the pilot fee applies — $35K to $75K per process unit, priced by data volume, security requirements, and pilot success criteria. If not, you keep the pack and pay nothing.

A 4-week read-only shadow pilot on historian and alarm exports. We agree the KPI model first. If the sealed evidence pack maps $5M+ in addressable value, the pilot fee applies. If not, you keep the pack and pay nothing.

The Twin-3 Value Commitment
  • Above $5M Pilot fee applies. Operator keeps the sealed evidence pack.
  • Below $5M · no credible path Operator pays nothing. Evidence pack is yours. Engagement closes cleanly.
  • Below $5M · credible path found Operator pays nothing for the first pass. Twin-3 may fund one agreed diagnostic expansion under written scope.
91.7%
Fault detection · 11 of 12 families
TEP benchmark · 330 trajectories
0
False alarms · 4,590 calibration windows
Zero pre-fault burden
< 1%
Nuisance trigger rate
Adaptive conformal calibration
SHA-256
Sealed evidence chain
Procurement-verifiable in 10s

Performance on the Tennessee Eastman Process public benchmark and the Manca public alarm dataset. Real-plant performance is established during your pilot on your own historian data — that is the point of the pilot.

Who this is for

Built for reliability leads, process-safety teams, digital operations, and procurement/IT reviewers at process-major and regulated manufacturing sites.

Reliability
Bearing drift, valve drift, cycling loops, recurring fault signatures. Twin-3 reads the physics that the dashboard does not.
Process Safety
Standing alarms, priority inversion, ISA-18.2 / IEC 62682 / EEMUA 191 gaps. Sealed evidence the auditor will accept.
Digital Operations
Historian forensics, alarm rationalisation, decision-support evidence. No DCS install, no integration project.
Procurement / IT
SHA-256 verifiable, read-only by architecture, MSA / DPA-ready, operator-local jurisdiction schedule for UAE / KSA / UK / EU.

Four conversations your control room has at 3 AM.

Not vendor stats. Real questions your engineers ask when the console lights up. Twin-3 was engineered against these four specific conversations. Each one costs measured money. Each one has an audited answer.

Between a vendor guess and a verified answer sits an audited evidence layer.
01Reliability
Early-Risk
BEARING P-104A 47 Hz ↗
Industry baseline
$2M / event
01 · Reliability

"Which actuator surprises me this week."

Twin-3 reads the valve, controller, and upstream signature before the loop breaks. The bearing shows up in the physics, not the vendor manual. Physics-led diagnostics, not vendor guesses.

02Control Systems
Cycling
FT-104
Investigation hours
42 hrs/wk
02 · Control Systems

"Loop is cycling. Valve, controller, or upstream — the historian has the answer."

Twin-3 traces the cycle to the tag that started it, in minutes not days. The historian stops being a haystack. Your engineers stop hunting. Your third day of investigation stops costing more than the second.

03Process Safety
Sealed
∑ṁ P(α) rₜ ΔU SHA
Audit Time
10 seconds
03 · Process Safety

"The auditor will ask why we missed it. I need evidence, not a screenshot."

Twin-3 returns a SHA-256 sealed evidence pack. Procurement IT runs the hash check in ten seconds. The board sees what was seen, when, and why. The vendor dashboard does not survive a serious review. The sealed pack does.

04Ops Excellence
Noise
1 TI-301 2 PIC-204 3 LIC-208
Industry baseline
70%+ nuisance
04 · Operations Excellence

"70% of our alarms are nuisance. The console stopped being trusted years ago."

Twin-3 ranks alarm floods into a worklist, not noise. Operators see the signal first. The console becomes trusted again. Six years of programs that did not move the numbers compress into one sealed pilot pack that does.

From "something is wrong" to "here is the verified reason".

Every Twin-3 finding travels two phases. The Detective searches your historian for the law that broke. The Vault seals what was found so procurement, the regulator, and the board can verify it themselves. The arc reduces the time between alarm and answer.

Phase 01 · The Detective

A beam that ignores 70% of the noise.

The detective beam scans your refinery's digital nervous system, ignores the nuisance traffic, and snaps onto the specific bearing, valve, or controller that is about to break the loop. Every step traces back to a physics equation the plant already obeys.

P-104A · BEARING
Status · Identified rₜ = yₜ − ŷₜ 04:17:23 UTC
Phase 02 · The Vault

A pack that survives a serious review.

The diagnostic compresses into a sealed evidence pack. A SHA-256 hash crawls across the surface and locks. Timestamps, sensor logs, ISA-18.2 / IEC 62682 alignment checks. Filed to a read-only archive. Audit-ready. Procurement-verified.

SHA-256 SEALED 26733690a95485922943fea536d315 902b238892ee75b631100c068edbe9df47 ISA-18.2 ✓ IEC 62682 ✓ TIMESTAMP ✓ HASH ✓ ✓ AUDIT READY ✓ PROCUREMENT ✓ READ-ONLY
Status · Sealed SHA-256 Verify · 10s

It reads the laws your plant already obeys.

SAMPLE FRAME
Physics Layer ° Engaged
Unit · DA-501
TIC-301 FT-104 LIC-208
Engineered for 2026

Mathematics, physics, thermodynamics.
Precise. Sourced. Audited.

Twin-3 does not guess your plant. It reads the laws your plant already obeys, and tells you, with proof, the moment those laws break. Every residual sits inside a conformal coverage bound. Every coverage bound sits inside an audit chain. Every audit chain sits inside a hash you can verify.

No black box. No assumptions you did not approve. The intelligence layer that respects what your engineers already trust.

Engineering direction 11 of 12 fault families today, with IDV3 isolated as a known boundary case. The engineering work continues to push that boundary toward as-close-to-entirely as the physics will allow. The product is benchmarked, sealed, and ready for bounded pilot evaluation. The next benchmark release tightens the boundary further.

Mathematics
Physics
Thermodynamics

Benchmark-sealed. Pilot-ready. Evidence-gated. Sealed auditable evidence.

Industrial Integrity Metrics, validated on the Tennessee Eastman Process and the Manca public alarm benchmark. Every number you see here lives inside a sealed evidence pack. Procurement IT runs the hash check before the deployment conversation begins.

Benchmark · TEP / Manca Sealed evidence chain SHA-256 verifiable Verification · 10 seconds
Sensitivity
91.7%
Post-introduction detection, 11 of 12 Tennessee Eastman fault families covered. IDV3 declared as a known boundary case.
Reliability
0
False positives in baseline operation, across 4,590 calibration-holdout windows.
Precision
<1%
Nuisance trigger rate. Twin-3 does not get distracted by normal process changes.
Audit
SHA-256 verified evidence chain. Procurement IT verifies before deployment conversation.
ISA-18.2 / IEC 62682 Aligned
Read-Only · No DCS Access
256
SHA-256 Sealed Manifest
What we need from you

Three exports. Eight hours of your team. No plant-network agent.

01
Historian time series
A four-week window of sensor data from your historian (PI / AVEVA / Aspen / Honeywell / OSIsoft compatible). CSV export, no live connection.
02
Alarm / event journal
The corresponding alarm journal for the same window — annunciations, acknowledgements, suppressions, source tags.
03
Tag dictionary
The tag list mapping historian tags to physical equipment, units, and process functions. Whatever level of detail your engineering team already maintains.
✕ No DCS connection ✕ No SIS access ✕ No SCADA tunnel ✕ No plant-network agent

The questions your procurement, security, and reliability leads will ask. Click to expand.

01 / 09 Does Twin-3 connect to our DCS or SIS?

No. Twin-3 is read-only on historian, alarm, and sensor exports. No DCS access. No SIS access. No control authority. No replacement of certified safety systems.

The deployment surface is your data export, not your control network. No OT asset modification. No DCS install. No control-network access. Your existing IT, security, and procurement workflows still apply — DPIA, vendor onboarding, data-handling review — but the pilot does not touch any safety-rated or control-rated infrastructure.

02 / 09 What data do you need, and where does it go?

Three CSV exports: tag list, historian sample, alarm journal. 4-week window. Hosted in your jurisdiction of choice. Deletable on request at any point including after pilot.

No SCADA tunnel, no VPN into your control room, no agent installed on a plant machine. The pilot is procurement-grade because the data surface is procurement-grade — three files, one analysis environment, full chain-of-custody record.

03 / 09 Can your evidence pack pass our procurement IT review?

Every artefact in the pack carries a SHA-256 hash and a manifest. Your IT team verifies the chain in 10 seconds with standard tools. No special verifier required.

The pack is designed for procurement IT before it is designed for engineering. Audit trail, timestamp, hash chain, derivation log, ISA-18.2 / IEC 62682 alignment markers, GDPR-compatible. If it fails a review, the deployment never starts — and we want to know.

04 / 09 How is this different from PI AF, OSIsoft, or AspenTech APM?

Those platforms run on your DCS to operate your plant. Twin-3 audits your historian to evidence value-at-risk. Different scope, different deployment, different procurement path.

We do not replace your APM or your historian. We sit beside them and answer one question: where in your existing data is the addressable operational value you have not yet acted on. The output is forensic evidence, not control output.

05 / 09 What happens if Twin-3 does not find $5M?

If the sealed evidence pack does not map at least $5M in operator-agreed addressable value, the pilot fee does not apply. You keep the evidence pack. There are three commercial outcomes, defined before any data is sent:

Above $5M. Pilot fee applies, you keep the sealed evidence pack.
Below $5M, no credible path. You pay nothing and keep the evidence pack.
Below $5M, credible path found. You pay nothing for the first pass. Twin-3 may fund one agreed diagnostic expansion under a written extension. If the second pass still does not clear the value gate, no fee applies and the engagement closes.

We are not guaranteeing realised savings before implementation — realising value depends on your team's maintenance and operations decisions. We are guaranteeing a value-gated pilot: before it starts we agree the KPIs and cost model; Twin-3 then runs read-only and produces sealed evidence against that model. Twin-3 does not ask you to believe a claim — it asks you to test the claim on your own data, under your own KPIs, with a payment gate tied to verified addressable value.

06 / 09 Does Twin-3 cover our specific equipment types?

Public-benchmark coverage today: distillation, reactors, heat exchangers, compressors, flow control loops. Equipment beyond the benchmark is scoped explicitly in the pilot — declared coverage, not assumed coverage.

We do not over-promise on equipment families we have not benchmarked. If your unit type sits outside our public-benchmark coverage, the pilot starts with a scoping conversation, and you keep the evidence either way. The current sealed build covers 11 of 12 Tennessee Eastman fault families — IDV3 declared as a known boundary case.

07 / 09 What is the deployment timeline?

Contract to evidence pack: 4 weeks. Eight hours of your team's time. Week 1 scoping, weeks 2-3 forensic run, week 4 evidence pack delivery and value review.

No multi-month integration project. The deployment is bounded because the data surface is bounded — three CSV files, one analysis environment. If we slip the 4-week window without your prior agreement, the pilot becomes free regardless of evidence.

08 / 09 Who owns the evidence pack and the IP in our data?

You. Always. Read-only means we do not retain. The evidence pack is your property under the pilot agreement. We retain only the methodology (the sealed-build release artefacts) and the public-benchmark calibration.

Your operational data is yours. The derived findings are yours. The hash chain proves chain-of-custody. The methodology and benchmark calibration are ours — that is what we license, that is what the fee is for. Nothing about your plant lives in our systems after the pilot closes if you so request.

09 / 09 What law governs the pilot?

The standard Twin-3 pilot pack is structured under English law with UK data-protection controls. Operator-local data requirements are handled through a jurisdiction schedule before any export is received.

For UAE operators, a UAE PDPL jurisdiction schedule is drafted to cover cross-border transfer and sharing requirements before any export is received. For Saudi operators, a KSA PDPL schedule is drafted to cover controller obligations and rights. Dispute routes can be set to DIFC or ADGM arbitration where operator procurement requires it. Data residency is operator-selected: UK secure cloud, operator cloud tenant, or local/GCC-hosted environment, defined before data transfer.

Your specific savings, on your specific operation.

Four fields. A defensible range, not a vendor estimate. Every multiplier sourced. Every assumption visible. The calculator below answers "would Twin-3 cross the $5M threshold on our unit?" — auditable in 30 seconds. Forward the URL to your reliability lead; the configuration is preserved.

70%
Projected addressable value · 12-month · pre-realisation
Low estimate
$0
High estimate
$0
$5M
Calculating…
Assumption Stack · Auditable
  1. Loading derivation…
Pilot Fee · This Configuration
$0
Calculating…
◇ Siemens True Cost of Downtime 2024 ◇ Aberdeen Research 2023 ◇ ISA-18.2 Industry Benchmark ◇ ARC Advisory Group

A value-first framework. Read-only for the site. Audit-ready for the boardroom.

The First Pilot

No pilot fee if we cannot map the value.
Paid only when the evidence clears the gate.

4 weeks of historian data. 8 hours of your time. We deliver a sealed forensic evidence pack mapped against KPIs you already use. The commercial contract follows only once $5M+ in addressable operational value is mapped on your own data. If the evidence does not clear the agreed threshold, you keep the pack and do not pay the pilot fee.

Operator-Agreed Value Model
We agree the value formula before the pilot starts. Each evidence category links to your operating cost, downtime cost, labour rate, and risk assumptions. Twin-3 does not invent the number.
Evidence That Adds Up
Bad actors, standing alarms, cycling loops, fault signatures, priority inversion, alarm-burden hours. Each finding links to a value bucket. Each bucket sums to the addressable number.
From Identification to Action
Twin-3 does not stop at "here is the anomaly." Every finding in the closeout pack carries an engineering-backed action and an estimated financial impact under your agreed cost model. Whether you act on it is your decision; the path forward is on the page, not buried in our system.
Forensic Evidence Pack · Pilot Deliverable

What you get in week 4. Every finding sourced.

Value Bucket
Twin-3 Evidence
Value Linkage
Alarm Flood Reduction
Top 10 bad actors · chattering / fleeting / standing alarms · priority inversion
Operator hours × loaded labour rate · alarm-programme cost · event-response time
Reliability Risk
Recurring fault signatures · cycling loops · abnormal actuator and sensor patterns
Avoided downtime probability × your downtime cost per hour
Engineering Investigation
Repeated manual investigations · time spent in historian forensics
Hours saved × loaded engineering rate
Safety & Compliance
Missed abnormal patterns · priority-inversion evidence · standing-alarm exposure
Audit exposure × remediation priority · regulator-readiness signal
Maintenance Planning
Bad-actor recurrence · repeated asset signatures · shutdown-window candidates
Avoided repeat work · improved shutdown planning
Read-Only No DCS Access No Operational Disruption Sealed Pack Returned

In week four, here is what you receive.

Twin-3 does not stop at "here is the anomaly." Every finding in the closeout pack carries an engineering-backed action and an estimated financial impact under the cost model you agreed before the pilot started. The pack is sealed, the actions are ranked, and the next step is your call.

Sample · One Finding · As it appears in the pack
Evidence

Unit FC-247 · Alarm Journal · 28-day window. Twin-3 identified a chattering cluster across TI-301 / PIC-204 / LIC-208 generating 73% of console noise during operator shift handovers. Pattern matches priority-inversion signature documented in ISA-18.2 §13. Hash-chain verified. Source rows attached.

Engineering Action

Rationalisation of 11 alarm setpoints plus control-loop tuning on PIC-204 and deadband adjustment on TI-301. Estimated implementation effort: 2 engineering days. Estimated time-to-impact: 1 production shift after tuning applied.

Financial Logic

$2.3M / year addressable value, derived from: 14,200 alarm events × 4 min loaded operator-handling time × $185/hr loaded labour (your figure), plus avoided event-response cost (your figure). Pre-realisation. Booked only if action is taken.

Closeout Pack · Finding → Action → Financial Logic

Every finding follows the same shape.

Finding
Engineering Action
Financial Logic
Valve response lag preceding alarm floods
Inspect actuator / positioner / control-loop tuning
Reduced downtime exposure · nuisance-alarm hours recovered
Standing alarm cluster around a single unit
Rationalise alarm priority and deadband per ISA-18.2
Operator-burden hours × your loaded labour rate
Repeated pressure-flow mismatch on a controller
Check fouling, restriction, or sensor drift
Avoided efficiency loss · pre-failure intervention window
Recurring abnormal energy residual on a heat-exchanger
Inspect heat-transfer or flow-control path
Avoided off-spec / slowdown · your throughput cost
Claim Language · Three States
Before pilot
"Twin-3 aims to map $5M+ in operator-agreed addressable value."
A promise about what the evidence pack will or will not show. Anchored in pilot mechanics, not realised cash.
After pilot, if successful
"Twin-3 mapped $X in addressable operational value from your data, with sealed evidence and engineering-backed actions."
A statement about findings on the operator's actual data, scored against the agreed value model.
After implementation
"Twin-3 helped realise $X in measured savings at [Operator]."
A claim about realised cash, made only with attribution and only after the operator has acted and measured.
After the Closeout

The decision is yours. Deploy Twin-3 on the pilot unit for measured value capture. Expand to additional units. Request deeper diagnostic work on a specific finding. Integrate evidence into alarm-management or maintenance planning. Or close the engagement with the pack archived. Twin-3 does not assume the next step — the evidence is the basis on which you choose it.

What the pilot leaves behind.

Your next 3 AM shift is quieter. The console no longer screams ninety thousand alarms a month — your operators see the signal first. The cycling loop has a name, the bearing has a forecast, the auditor has a sealed pack. Engineering meetings stop being investigations.

The historian stops being a haystack and becomes an addressable map of operational truth. Every finding traces back to a physics equation your plant already obeys. The board sees the numbers, the regulator sees the evidence, and your engineering team gets the one thing the industry has not given them: time.

Twin-3 ORCA does not optimise your plant for you. It returns to your team the structural clarity they have been working without. The $5M lives in what they can finally see.

Request the Scoping Briefing